UAP Investigations
  • About
  • Cases
  • Reports
  • Dispatches
  • Contact
Sign in Subscribe
By UAPI Admin in cases — 22 Feb 2026

Columbus 1492: The Light Before Landfall

On October 11, 1492, Columbus recorded seeing a light "like a small wax candle that rose and lifted up" four hours before landfall. Authenticated primary source with multiple conventional explanations.

Christopher Columbus aboard the Santa Maria
AI visualization based on witness descriptions. This is a dramatization, not a photograph.
CASE IDUAPI-1492-001
DATEOctober 11, 1492, 10:00 PM
LOCATIONAtlantic Ocean, approaching the Bahamas
COORDINATES24.5°N 77.5°W (approximate)
CLASSIFICATIONHISTORICAL-ANOMALY
EVIDENCE QUALITYMODERATE
Christopher Columbus recorded in his ship's log that four hours before landfall, he observed a light "like a small wax candle that rose and lifted up," witnessed also by Pedro Gutiérrez.
532YEARS OLD

On the night of October 11, 1492, just hours before the historic landfall in the Americas, Christopher Columbus recorded observing an unusual light from the deck of the Santa María. According to the ship's log as preserved in the Abstract by Bartolomé de las Casas, Columbus saw "a light like a small wax candle that rose and lifted up."

Columbus called Pedro Gutiérrez, the royal steward, who also reportedly observed the light. A third man, Rodrigo Sánchez de Segovia, was called but stated he did not see it. The sighting occurred approximately four hours before land was sighted by lookout Rodrigo de Triana aboard the Pinta.

The account survives through Las Casas's transcription of Columbus's original log, which has been lost. While the Las Casas abstract is generally considered reliable, it represents a secondary source. Multiple conventional explanations have been proposed, including native fishing torches on a closer island that was bypassed, and bioluminescence, though the latter has been challenged based on lunar phase analysis.

Historical Context

Columbus's first voyage departed Spain on August 3, 1492, with three ships: the Santa María, Pinta, and Niña. By October 11, the crew had been at sea for over two months and tensions were high. Columbus had promised a reward to the first man to sight land, creating incentive for observation.

The original ship's log kept by Columbus has been lost. The primary surviving source is an abstract made by Bartolomé de las Casas in the 1530s. Las Casas had access to the original log and is considered a generally reliable transcriber, though his work represents an abridged version rather than a complete copy. This documentary situation is important for evaluating the account.

Timeline

August 3, 1492
Palos de la Frontera, Spain
Columbus departs with three ships: Santa María, Pinta, and Niña [1]
October 11, 1492, 10:00 PM
Atlantic Ocean
Columbus observes "a light like a small wax candle that rose and lifted up" from the Santa María [2]
October 11, 1492, 10:00 PM
Santa María
Pedro Gutiérrez called to deck; reportedly confirms sighting. Rodrigo Sánchez called but does not see it [2]
October 12, 1492, 2:00 AM
Approaching Bahamas
Rodrigo de Triana on the Pinta sights land; Columbus claims reward citing his earlier light sighting [1]
1530s
Spain
Bartolomé de las Casas creates abstract of Columbus log, preserving the light account [3]
Present
Various archives
Las Casas abstract survives; original log lost [3]

Witness Accounts

Christopher ColumbusAdmiral of the Ocean Sea, expedition commander[Historical figure; account from his log via Las Casas transcription]
"The Admiral, at ten o'clock at night, being on the sterncastle, saw a light, though it was so uncertain that he could not affirm it was land. It was like a small wax candle that rose and lifted up."
Ship log entry, October 11, 1492 [2]
Pedro GutiérrezRoyal steward aboard Santa María[Historical figure documented in voyage records]
"[Called by Columbus; reportedly also saw the light]"
Witness confirmation per Columbus log [2]
Rodrigo Sánchez de SegoviaRoyal comptroller aboard Santa María[Historical figure documented in voyage records]
"[Called by Columbus; stated he did not see the light]"
Called as witness but negative observation [2]

Competing Explanations

Native fishing torches on nearby island [1][4]

Supporting Evidence

Indigenous Taíno people used torches for night fishing. The light could have been on a closer island that the ships bypassed before reaching Guanahani. This was Columbus's own interpretation.

Conflicting Evidence

The description of light "rising and lifting" does not match stationary or slowly moving torches. Distance estimation at night over water is difficult.

Bioluminescence in water [4]

Supporting Evidence

Caribbean waters contain bioluminescent organisms that can produce light. Ship movement could trigger glowing in disturbed water.

Conflicting Evidence

The account describes light in the sky/horizon, not water. Lunar phase analysis suggests significant moonlight, reducing bioluminescence visibility.

Meteor or atmospheric phenomenon [4]

Supporting Evidence

Meteors can appear as rising lights before arcing down. Atmospheric phenomena could create unusual light effects.

Conflicting Evidence

The description emphasizes sustained or repeated observation ("rose and lifted up") rather than brief streak.

Wishful perception under pressure [1][4]

Supporting Evidence

Crew was desperate to sight land after months at sea. Columbus had strong incentive to claim first sighting for the reward. Sánchez did not see it.

Conflicting Evidence

Gutiérrez independently confirmed sighting. Columbus was an experienced navigator. The specific description suggests actual observation rather than invention.

Modern Analysis

Historical Status: No formal investigation (15th century)
Scholarly Method: Modern scholars have analyzed Las Casas transcription, voyage reconstruction, and astronomical conditions
Finding: Account is preserved in reliable Las Casas abstract; original log lost; multiple explanations proposed
Conclusion: The sighting is documented in the surviving record; interpretation remains debated among historians and researchers [3][4]
Scholarly Debate: Historians generally favor native torch explanation; anomaly researchers note the unusual description; some question reliability of Las Casas transmission
SOURCE LOG
[1]Morison, Samuel Eliot. "Admiral of the Ocean Sea: A Life of Christopher Columbus." Little, Brown, 1942. Definitive biography with voyage reconstruction.[secondary]
[2]Columbus, Christopher. Ship's log, October 11, 1492, as preserved in Las Casas abstract. Primary account of the sighting.[primary]
[3]Las Casas, Bartolomé de. Abstract of Columbus's log, 1530s. Biblioteca Nacional de España. Primary surviving source for voyage details.[primary]
[4]Vallée, Jacques and Aubeck, Chris. "Wonders in the Sky." Tarcher/Penguin, 2009. Analysis of Columbus sighting with astronomical reconstruction.[secondary]
Editorial Note: This account is preserved in the Las Casas abstract of Columbus's log, a generally reliable historical source. The original log has been lost. UAPI presents the account with appropriate context regarding source transmission.

Key Researchers & Witnesses

Profiles related to this case:

  • Jacques Vallée – UFO researcher
  • J. Allen Hynek – Project Blue Book astronomer
  • John E. Mack – Harvard psychiatrist
Previous

Byland Abbey 1290 Silvery Disc

Next

Boston 1639: America's First Documented UFO Sighting

You might also like...

Kenneth Arnold & the Birth of the "Flying Saucer" (1947)

On June 24, 1947, private pilot Kenneth Arnold observed nine bright, fast‑moving objects near Mount Rainier, Washington. His credible account—later verified by military intelligence—ignited a national media frenzy, coined the term “flying saucer,” and became the catalyst for the modern UFO era.
Read More
UAPI Admin
Maury Island 1947: The Dirtiest Hoax in UFO History
cases

Maury Island 1947: The Dirtiest Hoax in UFO History

Harold Dahl and Fred Crisman claimed UFOs dropped debris on their boat, but FBI investigation determined it was a hoax. Two Air Force officers died in a plane crash while returning from investigating the claims.
Read More
UAPI Admin
Alexander the Great "Silver Shields": A Modern Invention
cases

Alexander the Great "Silver Shields": A Modern Invention

The popular claim that Alexander the Great witnessed "flying shields" or "silver shields" in the sky is a modern invention with no basis in ancient sources. The story first appeared in Frank Edwards' 1959 book without any citation to ancient texts.
Read More
UAPI Admin
Ireland Medieval Aerial Ship Accounts (956-1211 AD)
cases

Ireland Medieval Aerial Ship Accounts (956-1211 AD)

Multiple medieval Irish texts spanning several centuries record incidents of "ships sailing through the air" over monasteries, with remarkably consistent details including anchors dropping from the vessels and becoming entangled.
Read More
UAPI Admin
UAP Investigations © 2026
  • Sign up
Powered by Ghost